The accused Harvard plagiarist doesn’t have a photographic memory. Kaavya Viswanathan has an excuse. On this morning’s New York Times, the author of How Opal Mehta Bought Kissed, Got Wild, and Received a Life explained how she "unintentionally and unconsciously" plagiarized upward of 29 passages from the books of one other younger-grownup novelist, Megan McCafferty. Viswanathan said she has a photographic memory. This seems like as good a chance as any to clear up the greatest enduring delusion about human memory. Tons of individuals declare to have a photographic memory, but nobody truly does. Well, possibly one particular person. In 1970, a Harvard vision scientist named Charles Stromeyer III revealed a landmark paper in Nature a few Harvard scholar named Elizabeth, who could carry out an astonishing feat. Stromeyer showed Elizabeth’s proper eye a sample of 10,000 random dots, and a day later, he showed her left eye one other dot sample. She mentally fused the two photographs to type a random-dot stereogram after which saw a three-dimensional image floating above the floor.
memverge.com

Elizabeth appeared to offer the primary conclusive proof that photographic memory is possible. However then in a cleaning soap-opera twist, Stromeyer married her, and she was never tested again. In 1979, a researcher named John Merritt printed the outcomes of a photographic Memory Wave brainwave tool take a look at he had positioned in magazines and newspapers across the nation. Merritt hoped someone might come ahead with abilities similar to Elizabeth’s, and he figures that roughly 1 million individuals tried their hand at the check. Of that number, 30 wrote in with the suitable answer, and he visited 15 of them at their homes. Nevertheless, with the scientist wanting over their shoulders, not one in all them might pull off Elizabeth’s trick. There are such a lot of unlikely circumstances surrounding the Elizabeth case-the wedding between topic and scientist, the lack of further testing, the lack to find anybody else together with her skills-that some psychologists have concluded that there’s something fishy about Stromeyer’s findings. He denies it. "We don’t have any doubt about our information," he told me just lately.

That’s not to say there aren’t people with extraordinarily good reminiscences-there are. They only can’t take mental snapshots and recall them with good fidelity. 53-12 months-old savant who was the idea for Dustin Hoffman’s character in Rain Man, is said to have memorized each page of the 9,000-plus books he has read at 8 to 12 seconds per page (each eye reads its personal web page independently), though that claim has by no means been rigorously tested. Another savant, Stephen Wiltshire, has been known as the "human camera" for his ability to create sketches of a scene after taking a look at it for only a few seconds. However even he doesn’t have a really photographic memory. His mind doesn’t work like a Xerox. Photographic memory is often confused with one other bizarre-but actual-perceptual phenomenon known as eidetic memory, which occurs in between 2 and 15 p.c of kids and really not often in adults. An eidetic image is actually a vivid afterimage that lingers in the mind’s eye for up to a few minutes earlier than fading away.

Youngsters with eidetic memory by no means have anything close to good recall, and they sometimes aren’t able to visualize something as detailed as a physique of text. In each case except Elizabeth’s the place someone has claimed to possess a photographic memory, there has always been one other clarification. A bunch of Talmudic scholars identified as the Shass Pollakssupposedly saved mental snapshots of all 5,422 pages of the Babylonian Talmud. In response to a paper printed in 1917 in the journal Psychological Overview, psychologist George Stratton tested the Shass Pollaks by sticking a pin via various tractates of the Talmud. They responded by telling him precisely which words the pin passed through on every web page. In truth, the Shass Pollaks in all probability didn’t possess photographic Memory Wave so much as heroic perseverance. If the average individual decided he was going to dedicate his total life to memorizing 5,422 pages of textual content, he’d most likely even be fairly good at it. It’s an impressive feat of single-mindedness, not of memory.